← Back to blog

Preferred Sources: a star icon, and the data Google isn't sharing

Google shipped a small feature this past year that lets you tell Search which news sites you actually trust. It's called Preferred Sources. If you haven't noticed it, that's kind of the point — it's a star icon next to Top Stories, easy to miss, easy to use once you find it.

Tap the star, check the outlets you want more of, hit reload. Google says those sources will now surface more often, but not exclusively, everyone else stays in the mix too.

Where this came from

Preferred Sources didn't appear out of nowhere. It's the Search-side sibling of a feature Google shipped a month earlier in Discover: a "Follow" button that let you subscribe directly to a publisher or creator and get a dedicated feed of their articles, videos, and social posts. Discover has run on implicit signals since 2018 — Google guessing what you want from your clicks and dwell time. Follow flipped that. Instead of Google inferring your taste, you stated it.

Preferred Sources does the same thing for the part of Search that already looked the most like a news feed. The timeline:

That last step matters more than the rest combined. This stopped being a Top Stories widget and became a signal that follows you into Google's AI answers, where preferred sources are meant to get pulled higher in the citation list and quoted more often.

The pitch

Google's own numbers, as of the most recent update: over 345,000 unique sources selected worldwide, up from the 200,000+ it reported a month earlier — everything from local blogs to national newsrooms. More than half of the early Labs testers picked four or more sources, so people are building reading lists, not crowning one favorite. The headline stat Google repeats in every announcement: people are twice as likely to click through to a source once they've marked it preferred.

That's Google's number, from Google's data, with no base rate or methodology attached to check it against.

You get a star icon and Google keeps the dashboard.

What publishers are actually finding

Six months in, Digiday reported that publishers still had no way to measure what the feature was doing for them: no traffic breakdown, no count of how many readers had selected their site, no Top Stories filter in Search Console. Chartbeat told them the same thing, that it's too new and too folded into general Google traffic to isolate.

A Media Operator talked to the people who'd actually have to use it. Phil Schroeder, who runs digital for Times Journal Media (25 outlets across Georgia, including the Marietta Daily Journal), said he found out about Preferred Sources from a Slack group for news product people, not from Google. He hadn't started asking readers to use it yet, because, in his words, the ecosystem wasn't even working correctly enough to justify the push. Kyle Constable, head of product at The Assembly in North Carolina, put it more bluntly: Google Search still drives around half of his traffic, but the upside from that relationship shrinks a little more every year, and this is the least publisher-friendly version yet of Google trying to own how people find news: no licensing, no revenue share, no data.

Worth sitting with why anyone would still take the deal. Ahrefs found that AI Overviews were already cutting organic clicks by 34.5% back in April 2025; by February 2026 that number had climbed to 58% for the top organic result whenever an AI Overview appeared above it. SISTRIX put a figure on what that means in Germany alone: roughly 265 million organic clicks lost every month. Individual publishers have confirmed it in their own numbers — CNN reported organic traffic down 27 to 38%, HubSpot as much as 70 to 80%. Preferred Sources showed up in the middle of that, costing Google nothing to run, while it hands publishers a lever that at least nominally sits in the reader's hands instead of the algorithm's.

Maybe, as The Decoder puts it, it’s a way for Google to shift responsibility unto users and publishers at a time in which it’s eating their traffic and stealing their content. At such a time, an opt-in tool could generate goodwill and a defense against regulatory pressure, particularly from the EU.

Still, if every other publisher leverages the button and you don’t, it becomes a liability. If you implement it, make sure you’re measuring how often people click on it: that’s as much data as you’re going to get right now.

If you want the button

Getting readers to select you as a preferred source starts with making it easy to find. Google's own link (google.com/preferences/source) works, but almost nobody knows it exists unless you put it in front of them.

I built a small tool that generates a proper "Add as a preferred source" button for your site — pick a style, preview it, copy the code. It just points to Google's own preference screen with your domain pre-filled. Nothing fancier than that.